17 Jun

12.20 House / Alex Nogueira

first_img “COPY” 12.20 House / Alex Nogueira CopyAbout this officeAlex NogueiraOfficeFollowProductsSteelConcrete#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousesCampo GrandeBrazilPublished on January 27, 2014Cite: “12.20 House / Alex Nogueira” [Casa 12.20 / Alex Nogueira] 27 Jan 2014. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021. ISSN 0719-8884Browse the CatalogFaucetshansgroheKitchen MixersVinyl Walls3MExterior Vinyl Finish – DI-NOC™ Fine WoodPartitionsSkyfoldVertically Folding Operable Walls – Zenith® SeriesCultural / SportsPENT FitnessFitness Equipment – BANKA™ Weight BenchSignage / Display SystemsGoppionDisplay Case – B-ClassConcreteKrytonCrystalline Waterproofing – KIMMetal PanelsTrimoQbiss One in OfficesBricksFeldhaus KlinkerFacing Bricks – Waterstruck VascuWood Boards / HPL PanelsInvestwoodViroc Nature for FurnitureCurtain WallsMetawellFacades – Aluminum Curtain WallsHeatingFocusFireplaces – PaxfocusPatios / TerracesGlas MarteGlass Pavilion – GM Pavillon360More products »Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否翻译成中文现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?Take me there »✖You’ve started following your first account!Did you know?You’ll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream Brazil Houses Architects: Alex Nogueira Year Completion year of this architecture project Projects ArchDaily “COPY” CopyHouses•Campo Grande, Brazilcenter_img ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/470145/12-20-house-alex-nogueira Clipboard Save this picture!© André Barbosa+ 24 Share Year:  ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/470145/12-20-house-alex-nogueira Clipboard Photographs:  André BarbosaLandscape:Alex Nogueira e Gisele Nogueira YallouzStructural Engineering:José Francisco de LimaComplementary Projects:Paulo Moreira SilveiraSite Area:720 m²Project Team:Anderson Katsushi Watabe, Eliseu Cordeiro Nicolini JuniorCity:Campo GrandeCountry:BrazilMore SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!© André BarbosaText description provided by the architects. The search for simplicity, bowing to the canons of the past , the clear intention of using architecture as a path of territory and form of expression of “difference”… These are some of the requirements that guided the program under (intentionally or not) , much as metallic structure is common for many years, are easily countable copies directed to peripheral housing present in this town (Campo Grande/MS, even next a million people, values the “conventionality”), the geometric and strongly orthogonal character, partly, perhaps, of a controlling nature, fruit of modernism (however this is not a feature of the most admirable) or personality (for more than that is not a characteristic of the most admirable).Save this picture!© André BarbosaThe highest bidder soil binds the plot more generously on the bottom, where a glass door which accounts for almost the entire rear facade, gives access to the deck, and continuous view of the garden, the place where heaven and a yellow sculpture made with the leftovers of the metal structure (profiles ” I” Gerdau) dominate micro landscape (the particular universe). This large aperture for background contrasts sharply with the hermetic and closed front, both for privacy and solar protection, where a cloth horizontal metal of brises addresses these and other issues.Save this picture!© André BarbosaThe structure is apparent and mixed, both concrete and metal profiles are part of the aesthetic proposal, both for its inherent visual appearance and explained either by the vain and balances achieved, a game that tries to be subtle and objective.Save this picture!© André BarbosaIntegrator with a strong desire to plant boils down modulated in a large environment that splits into three basic needs: live, feed and rest, as usually happens, the furniture play a key role in setting and “fragmentation” of these spaces. The bathroom is the only room isolated, and even hydraulic wall dividing the kitchen, their access is returned to the room. 45 square meters reflect a proposed small private ambitions, few lines, few materials, environments, and a little bit of personality.Save this picture!Corte ABProject gallerySee allShow lessCenter for High Yield – Rowing Pocinho / Alvaro Fernandes AndradeSelected ProjectsNBBJ Designs Towering Shenzhen Campus for Internet GiantUnbuilt Project Share 2013 12.20 House / Alex NogueiraSave this projectSave12.20 House / Alex Nogueira Photographslast_img read more

26 May

Despite Marrying Willingly A Minor Girl Can’t Be Allowed To Stay With Husband Till She Attains Majority: Allahabad High Court

first_imgNews UpdatesDespite Marrying Willingly A Minor Girl Can’t Be Allowed To Stay With Husband Till She Attains Majority: Allahabad High Court Sparsh Upadhyay6 Feb 2021 1:24 AMShare This – xThe Allahabad High Court recently held that a minor girl cannot be allowed to live in a matrimonial relationship with a man she claims to be her husband, even if she had left her home of her own accord and married the Man out of her own free will. The Bench of Justice J. J. Munir ruled thus while taking into account her High School Certificate which “clearly indicated” that she is a…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginThe Allahabad High Court recently held that a minor girl cannot be allowed to live in a matrimonial relationship with a man she claims to be her husband, even if she had left her home of her own accord and married the Man out of her own free will. The Bench of Justice J. J. Munir ruled thus while taking into account her High School Certificate which “clearly indicated” that she is a minor as her date of birth is 04th November 2004. The Bench specifically stated, “So long as the prosecutrix is a minor, she cannot be permitted to accompany the accused Pintoo, whom she claims to have married.” The matter before the Court A Judicial Magistrate at Hapur had directed that prosecutrix/minor girl be permitted to go along with her husband, the accused Pintoo. This order was challenged before the High Court stating that the Magistrate erred in permitting the prosecutrix to accompany her husband, an accused in the crime. It was also submitted that she, not being a major, cannot be permitted to stay with her husband and ought not to be allowed to accompany him as doing so, would be permitting statutory rape and also an offence under Section 5/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. It was also contended that she cannot be permitted to stay in a matrimonial relationship, where the marriage would be void under Section 12 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. Court’s observations At the outset, the Court observed that Section 94(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 makes it vivid that in the face of a date of birth certificate from the school or the matriculation or equivalent certificate from the concerned examination Board, the other evidence about the age of a victim cannot be looked into. In this backdrop, the Court, while noting that Minor Girl’s High School Certificate “clearly indicates that she is a minor”, said, “There is no cavil that evidence about her being a major, which is her stand, cannot be accepted. She cannot be referred to medical examination for determination of her age, so long as her date of birth founded on her High School Certificate, is available.” Further, in order to determine whether the prosecutrix was enticed away from her guardian’s lawful custody, or she went away of her own, the Court ascertained the prosecutrix’s stand and found that she left her home of her own accord and married him. In this view of the matter, the Court said, “The marriage would not be void under Section 12 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, but would be voidable under Section 3 of the said Act.” The Court also said, “It would, therefore, be open to the prosecutrix to acknowledge the marriage or claim it to be void, once she attains the age of majority. It would also be open to her, once she attains the age of majority, to go wherever she likes and stay with whomsoever she wants.” Lastly, the Court issued the following directions: State asked to place her in a suitable State facility other than a Nari Niketan, may be a Safe Home/Shelter Home.The District Magistrate, Hapur and the Superintendent of Police, Hapur ordered to ensure that the prosecutrix is immediately housed in a suitable Safe Home/Shelter Home, or other State facility where she would be safe and taken care of.A Lady Judicial Officer, posted in his Judgeship, has been directed to visit the prosecutrix once a month and inquire about her welfare.Minor girl has been permitted to live in State facility/Safe Home/ Shelter Home till 04th November 2022, and thereafter, she may go wherever she wants and stay with whomsoever she likes, including Pintoo, whom she claims to be her husband. Case title – Pradeep Tomar And Another v. State of U.P. and Another [Matters Under Article 227 No. – 4804 of 2020] Click Here To Download Order/JudgmentRead Order/JudgmentNext Storylast_img read more